Showing posts with label Vincenzo Natali. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Vincenzo Natali. Show all posts

Saturday, June 02, 2018

Lost In Space (2018) (Season 1)

It seems almost pointless to do a remake in some cases.  If you stick too close to the original, the audience might as well go watch the original.  If you deviate too far, the remake becomes on in name only.  It seems like you might not be able to win.  I’ve found that the only time I can really enjoy a remake is if I’ve never seen the original.  Such is the case with Netflix’s Lost in Space.

The original ran from 1965-1968, which was about a decade before my time.  The new version borrows elements that you might expect, such as having a family named Robinson stranded on a planet while in transit to Alpha Centauri.  In the reboot, a large group is going to our nearest stellar neighbor, so the Robinsons aren’t exactly alone in being lost.

How is it, then, that the premise lasts for 10 episodes?  You’d think someone could get them off the planet.  With so many ships having crashed, surely someone has a working vehicle.  Early in the season, space eels eat all their fuel.  Yes.  All of the crashed ships become infested and lose every last drop.  Ok.  The main transport ship is in orbit.  So, someone can call for help.  They try that until someone realizes that the ship’s receiver got knocked off in an attack.  It turns out someone knows where a ship crashed that might not have been infested.  Yes, it has gas.  Good luck getting there and back safely.

It seems like the only thing interesting about the planet is an animal that drinks hybrid gas.  Everything else seems drawn out.  It turns out that there’s a black hole, which will be dangerous to humans, but this seems more like a way of putting a time limit on the humans’ stay on the planet.  It gives the mother ship, which is in orbit, a reason to have to possible leave everyone behind.

You do have some excitement, like one of the Robinson kids being put in danger.  Oh, and The Robot has an interesting backstory, although we don’t get to hear much about that.  It took several episodes to get into where The Robot came from.  It took a few more episodes to find out what his reasons for being there are.  (Ten episodes and we never get only hints as to what an alien civilization might look like.)

Plus, there is the female Dr. Smith that everyone’s talking about.  We get to see little bits of her story doled out.  She’s not to be trusted, but it’s not immediately evident why.   Even when people know not to trust her, she manages to manipulate people.  It seems to be the only thing she’s good at, other than stealing identities.

The entire first season seemed drawn out.  I would hope that certain things will be continued, or at least explained, in the second season.  However, I felt like the first season could have been handled better over a five-episode arc.  It’s almost like a soap opera in that a lot of things happen for the drama.  (You get a lot of cliffhangers and what not.)

It seems like the show was rushed to the screen, which is saying something considering that they had the original show to draw from.  If we’re going to be in space, why not show more aliens?  Even if they’re not humanoid, at least show some animals.  All we get is one lousy robot.  I feel like Netflix could have done better with this.

Monday, October 23, 2017

Cube (1997)

There’s a joke that NASA spent millions of dollars to create a pen that worked in space whereas its Soviet counterpart was content using pencils.  If the story is true, I’m sure there’s more to it than the punch line lets on. However, it does make a point; sometimes, simplicity is best.  Take a movie, for instance.  Get rid of the fancy editing and CGI.  Forget the cast of thousands.  Pare down the sets to just one or two.  What are you left with?  You’re left with a movie like Cube.

It starts out with a man in a room which, coincidentally, happens to be a cube of all things.  He walks through the room only to hear a sound and subsequently find himself sliced to death.  I mention this because it sets the tone of the movie.

Six other people meet up by traveling from room to room.  We have Leaven, a math student; Rennes, who can escape from prisons; Holloway, a medical professional; Quentin, a police officer; Worth, a paper pusher and Kazan, a savant with some sort of cognitive/mental disorder.  They don’t remember being brought to the cube, nor do they know what the cube is.

Each face of the room, whether it be wall, ceiling or floor, has a door in the center.  Each door has a set of three numbers.  The room on the other side may or may not have a trap, so hold on to your boots.  No, really.  They’ll need them to test the room for traps.

The biggest plan is cooperating.  As you might imagine, tension runs high.  The assumption is that the government is behind their imprisonment.  Who else would have the resources?  (No Mr. Tsoukalos; it’s not aliens.  Probably not.)  Either way, there’s still the issue of getting out.  Leaven is able to figure out that prime numbers are key to figuring out which rooms are trapped.  She’s also able to infer the size of the overall structure and which room to be in if they want to get out.

You might not think you could make a feature-length film out of a concept like this, but Vincenzo Natali did.  Not only that, but it spawned two additional movies, as sequel and a prequel.  (Natali wasn’t involved in either one.)  The big problem with the movie is that, in the absence of high-end effects and whatnot, dialogue has to carry the movie.  Having read other reviews, I might be in the minority here in thinking that it does.

The biggest thing you have to get rid of with a movie like this is expectations.  If you’re coming in expecting to find the meaning of life, you’re going to be disappointed.  If you’re looking for something that can showcase six people trapped in a maze they know nothing about, you’ve found a pretty good one.  It’s one that can even capture your attention through to the end.  There is a certain suspense as the characters alternate between helping and bickering.   Imagine you found yourself in that situation.  How do you think you’d react?